We sell judgement, not headcount
Every embedded engineering vendor offers the same thing: senior engineers in your repository, starting next week. That is a staffing answer to a judgement problem. We embed alongside the people who do the work to decide which parts of it should become a model, which should become ordinary code, and which should stay with a person.
Usually, most of the system should not be AI. A consultant is done when the report is accepted, an integrator when the spec is met. We are done when your team runs the system without us.
What that actually means
- We map the real process, exception by exception, not the documented one
- We draw the boundary between model, code, and human before we build
- We build on top of the systems you already run, never propose replacing them
- We hand over an evaluation suite, so you can tell when it stops being right
The Exception Ledger
Every real deviation from the documented process. Ask what step one is and you are told “an email arrives”; the reality is forty senders, no two formatted alike, and routing logic living in one person's head.
The AI Boundary Map
Which steps need a model, which need ordinary code, and which stay human. It is simultaneously a cost argument, a latency argument, and an auditability argument.
The evaluation suite
How you know the system is still correct after it ships, and what changed when it was not. A monthly accuracy report, not a promise.
The ERP-additive covenant
We build on top of your existing systems. We never propose replacing your ERP or gestionale. That is a commitment, not a preference.
